Discussion: Why do Most People Try to Reason with Unreformable Systems and People?

Here is an interesting question for my readers. Have you noticed that most people will never stop trying to interact and reason with unreformable systems and people? Let me explain that concept with a few examples to better illustrate my point.

1] One of my unpopular observations is that self-anointed white liberals, esp women, are the most delusionally racist people. They are also unusually prone to groupthink. Notably, this holds true over multiple countries. Furthermore, the degree of professed “liberalness” is directly proportional to the degree of racism. Consequently, I keep all my interactions with such people as brief and superficial as possible.

2] One of my other unpopular observations is that the vast majority of women who grew up in so-called “developed” countries are untrustworthy and to be quite blunt- not useful for anything other than sex. Now I do have some hypothesis for how things got this way, but that does not change how the ground reality. Engaging with them in an attempt to get anything beyond sex is a waste of time and potentially dangerous.

3] Another of my observations is as follows: the real-life competence and ability of a person to think independently is inversely proportional to how strongly they believe in any worldview. True and uncritical believers in any ideology are dumb- irrespective of how many degree or “qualifications” they posses. Arguing with them is a total waste of time. Especially true for professionals with such worldviews and so avoid them.

4] The trustworthiness of people is inversely proportional to how much they profess to be moralistic and altruistic. The majority of vocally Christian men who rant about the evils of porn and prostitution are almost certainly fantasizing about children in real life. Similarly every Silly Valley clown who struck riches and constantly pretends to “make the world a better place” or donate to large charitable causes or organizations is a greedy sociopath. Deal with them accordingly and don’t expect them to change.

5] Every large-ish institution that is part of an oligopoly or monopoly exists for its own survival and growth- at the expense of everyone else. Therefore belief in generosity, benevolence or general competence of the government, large corporations or any other large association is a fools errand. Treat every interaction as them as adversarial- since that is how they see it. They cannot be reasoned with and therefore act accordingly.

6] Any institution or originations that claims it wants to want to solve a problem, from homelessness and drug abuse to environmental and social issues, but has been unable to do so is run by scammers and staffed by dumb losers. The thing is,.. those running these organizations have no interest in solving problems because doing so will kill their livelihood. They are all in it for some combination of money, power and ego. This is why I would rather help somebody directly than give to any charity.

What do you think? Comments?