Here is a series I first contemplated writing over five years ago, though the core idea occurred a bit before that and in an unexpected place. See.. spending too much time on the less frequented parts of the internet often helps me notice correlations, trends and patterns that escape the attention of most people. About seven years ago, I was going through a newsgroup about large architectural projects all over the world and noticed an odd trend. Increasingly, the most interesting and large projects were in Asia, not North America or Europe. Some of you might attribute this to Asia finally catching up to the West, and I too initially considered that possibility. Then I noticed something else.. most of the few large building projects in West were heavily over budget and took far longer than expected. More interestingly, the results were usually of poor to atrociously bad quality and full of poor design choices.
Then I started noticing this same basic trend in many other areas, from drug discovery and computer technology to video games, movies and music. It was as if the past 15-20 years have been one continuous blur of stagnation if you were living in USA or any other western country. Some of you might say that smartphones, "machine learning" and other assorted bullshit is a sign of progress. But is it really? Pocket PCs with touch screens running Windows Mobile could be used to browse the web, check email, play games, watch movie clips, take photos, utilize GPS and many more things almost 20 years ago. The biggest "advance" smartphones represent is that they are permanently connected to high-speed networks because data transmission costs have gone down. Has all that hype about "machine learning", "deep learning" and "AI" translated into any worthwhile improvement in your quality of life?
While I would like to start this series by talking about how technology has stagnated, a better (more popular) place to start would be how cultural products have stagnated or gotten worse. While trends in music and video games will be addressed in subsequent posts, we will focus on trends in films and TV in this post. But before we go there, let us first define the 1990s. In my opinion, the 1990s began on December 26, 1991 and ended on September 11, 2001 though it kinda dragged on until August 31, 2005. The period between those dates was the last time the west (especially USA) was dominant and relatively prosperous. As you will see, these dates also define that decade in many fields. It is as if this time-span was the last hurrah for the western socio-economic model including neo-liberalism (and neo-conservatism).
Now let us get back to the main focus of this post, namely the almost total stagnation of creativity in films and TV shows (including online offerings). Here is a question- Do you remember any film or TV show released within the past 15 years that was not a direct derivative of something released earlier? Can you remember anything that was not a direct derivative of something from before 2006? But why does it matter? Well.. because almost every decade in the past hundred years prior to 2006 saw multiple major new trends in cinema and TV that were not a continuation of something from the previous one. To be fair, some of it was due to technological advances and changes in social mores- but much of it was driven by people experimenting with new ways to present novel material.
Confused? Let me explain..
Consider the 1920s, with German expressionist cinema producing movies such as ‘The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari’ and ‘Nosferatu’, Pre-Code Hollywood movies, Russian Cinema producing Battleship Potemkin and ‘October: Ten Days That Shook the World’. Can anybody deny that these represented new ways of making and editing films in addition to tackling new subject matter. The 1930s had its Monster movies, Musicals, Disney Cartoons and films by Leni Riefenstahl etc. The 1940s saw the birth of Film Noir and other memorable movies such as ‘Citizen Kane’, ‘It's a Wonderful Life’, ‘Casablanca’ etc. To be clear, I am not suggesting that previous decades were full of good, let alone original, movies. But it is clear that every decade in the past hundred years prior to 2006 saw the emergence of new and influential trends in cinema. However, we haven't really seen anything similar occurring in the past 15 years.
The 1960s had tons of new trends, as did the 1970s. The 1980s had their low-budget horror movies and summer action blockbusters. My point is that there was a lot of real innovation in western cinema for a century before 2006. But the something happened and western cinema now became boring, repetitive and, most importantly, forgettable. I have briefly touched on some of these issues in a post on my old blog about current rash of film remakes, reboots, sequels and prequels- and yes, I am aware that there are broader sociological trends at work. But whichever way you try to explain, it is hard to argue that the past fifteen years has seen the almost total stagnation of creativity in western cinema and TV shows.
Don't believe me? Well.. here are some facts. Most of the ‘LOTR’ trilogy was filmed in New Zealand between October 11, 1999 and December 22, 2000, and the first movie in that series came out on November 20, 2001. The first ‘X-men’ movie was released on July 14, 2000. The first film in the highly successful modern ‘Spider Man’ franchise came out on May 3, 2002. ‘The Matrix’ was released in 1999, as were the following- ‘Star Wars: Episode I’, ‘Office Space’, ‘Election’, ‘The Mummy’, ‘American Pie’, ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘The Sixth Sense’, ‘The Green Mile’, ‘Fight Club’, ‘American Beauty’, Sleepy Hollow and many more. 1998 saw the release of movies such as The Truman Show, ‘Armageddon’, ‘Deep Impact’, ‘Godzilla’, ‘The Big Lebowski’, ‘Wild Things’, ‘Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas’ and many more.
The first ‘Austin Powers’ movie came out in 1997 and the first ‘Jurassic Park’ in 1993. The first ‘Scream’ movie came out in 1996 and the first ‘I Know What You Did Last Summer’ in 1997. The first ‘Toy Story’ came out in 1995 and the first ‘Shrek’ movie in 2001. Can you think any equivalents in post 2005-era? Even the ‘40-year-old Virgin’ came out in 2005 and ‘Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy’ came out in 2004. ‘Superbad’ was filmed in 2006 and had been under development since 2000. I could keep going on and on- but you get my point. Pretty much every single major movie released in past 15 years can with very few exceptions directly trace its roots to the pre-2005 era. In the next part of this series, I will show how that the same is true for TV shows including their streaming variants. We will also start going into why this major socio-cultural-economic shift (aka stagnation) began in the mid-2000s.
What do you think? Comments?
Ya know I remember you touching on this stuff in blog posts on your old blog. I don't remember all the post titles. I did save some on my phone.
I have a few recommendations for old posts you could revisit and maybe update. The last one is just me sharing one I liked, don't think it makes sense to revisit it.
1)
You had a blog entry titled "Contemporary Transgenderism is based in Regressive Conservatism." Considering the current zeitgeist and state of affairs. I think it is worth sharing here.
2)
Your series on Societies, not individuals are Mentally Ill (I think it was a series or maybe it was just 1 post). When I think about the US political leadership (if you can call it leadership), people's voting behavior, and how people tend to treat one another in general focusing mainly in the US, but you can reasonably extend some of this to the West in general. I can't help but think many people must have sociopathic traits. In addition to that people just being delusional and both want and liked being lied to. Whatever helps you cope with life I guess.
This next point was inspired from something I read in one of Nassim Nicholas Taleb's books. This is in regards to the poor decision-making exhibited by political leaders in the west. I think they all lack skin in the game. They make decisions and they are divorced from the consequences of said actions. So they can basically make suicidal socio-economic policies and they likely will be just fine. The rest of us likely not.
Consider the current misadventures in Ukraine. Germany, Italy and other European countries had cheap oil/energy being provided to them by Russia. Then they decide to sanction them without really thinking through all the ramifications. As it is said in a Song of Fire and Ice, Winter is Coming. It was/is arguably a form of virtue signalling what leadership has done. I guess if I wasn't so jaded I would give them the benefit of the doubt and say they at least meant well.
I'll stop here on that for now otherwise I'll end up all over the place.
3)
Finally, a real long time ago you had a review or referenced at at least the book by Thomas Frank called What's the Matter with Kansas? I liked your take on it. An oldie, but another goodie. Really wish I saved that blog entry. Even still I did enjoy reading Thomas's book.
Gotta say, quite a few of things you said before appeared pretty prophetic.
Dunno if you read the book Apocalypse Never by Michael Shellenberger. But I think it might be worth a read for you. I got it on audiobook. The book acknowledges climate change, but talk about environmental alarmism causing more harm than good. Which reminds me, I think you had other blog entries on the flaws with "-isms" in general