Part 2: Elites are Not Good at Strategic or Long-Term Thinking
pharmaheretic.substack.com
In the previous part of this short series, I wrote about how the so-called “elites” are not especially intelligent or good at long-term thinking. Their modus operandi and attitudes are much closer to those displayed by parasites and cancers than anything even vaguely beneficial to society. While that post highlighted the role of random luck and general gullibility of public in their rise, this one will focus on how their short-term world view leads to their long-term fall. Please note that this post might come across as a bit hard to understand, because the concepts I am trying to put forth have no well-known equivalents in popular culture. With that in mind, let us start by asking the first obvious question.
Part 2: Elites are Not Good at Strategic or Long-Term Thinking
Part 2: Elites are Not Good at Strategic or…
Part 2: Elites are Not Good at Strategic or Long-Term Thinking
In the previous part of this short series, I wrote about how the so-called “elites” are not especially intelligent or good at long-term thinking. Their modus operandi and attitudes are much closer to those displayed by parasites and cancers than anything even vaguely beneficial to society. While that post highlighted the role of random luck and general gullibility of public in their rise, this one will focus on how their short-term world view leads to their long-term fall. Please note that this post might come across as a bit hard to understand, because the concepts I am trying to put forth have no well-known equivalents in popular culture. With that in mind, let us start by asking the first obvious question.